Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences

A Study of Arthroscopic Management of Meniscal Injuries in 20 Patients

Ajit Swamy, Kartikeya Sharma, Mukesh Phalak, Divyansu Goyel, Aniruddha Khirsagar

Abstract


Background Meniscal injuries are common as a result of sports related injuries and motor vehicle accidents. Current arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is indicated for the management of meniscal tears because of early rehabilitation and return to work and minimal complications. Present study is a hospital-based retrospective study of 20 adult cases admitted at Dr. DY Patil Medical College from January 2015 to January 2016. Common age group was between 10 and 40 years with mean of 27.05 years.

Aims and Objectives To study the effectiveness of arthroscopic management of meniscal injuries using Lysholm knee scoring and Tapper and Hoover grading system. To determine the type of meniscal injury that occurs in clinically suspected cases of meniscal injuries.

Materials and Methods This study includes 20 cases of menisical injuries of knee treated by closed arthroscopic partial meniscectomy at Dr. DY Patil Medical College, Pune from January 2015 to January 2016. Follow up has been done up to 6 months. This is a retrospective time-bound study conducted during the period from January 2015 to January 2016. Sample size consists of 20 patients.

Results The study consists of 20 cases of meniscal injuries with or without ACL tear, treated surgically by partial meniscectomy, 17 patients were male and 3 patients were female. Meniscal injuries on right knee were 11 cases and left knee were 9 cases. Type of meniscal tear was longitudinal 10 cases, oblique 5 cases, horizontal 3 cases, radial 1 case and complex (with discoid meniscus) tear 1 case. Meniscal injuries associated with partial/complete ACL tear were 6 cases. There was one case of discoid meniscus. Surgery was performed at an average 1 month after meniscal tear, duration of hospital stay was 3–6 days ranging from 3–6 days, mean time for earliest return to work was 14.35 days with range 10–16 days. Excellent to good results were seen in 95% of cases.

Conclusion Incidence of meniscal injuries is most common due to motor vehicle accident and other causes being sports related injuries and fall by slip. The advantage of arthroscopic meniscectomyis minimally invasive technique includes early return to work, minimal complications, early post-operative rehabilitation, short duration of hospital stay. Hence this is the preferred technique for treatment of meniscal injuries.


Keywords


meniscal injuries, arthroscopic management

Full Text:

References


Simpson DA, Thomas NP, Aichroth PM. Open and closed meniscectomy. A comparative analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br.1986;68:301–4.

Dandy DJ. The arthroscopic anatomy of symptomatic meniscal lesions. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72:628–33.

Shrive NG, O’Connor JJ, Goodfellow JW. Load-bearing in the knee joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978;(131):279–87.

Lysholm J, Gillquist J. Endoscopic meniscectomy. Int Orthop. 1981;5(4):265–70.

Rao SK, Rao PS. Lysholm II scoring system to evaluate meniscal injury. Indian J Orthop. 1997;31(2):107–9.

Dandy DJ, Jackson RW. The impact of arthroscopy on the management of disorders of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1975; 57:346–48.

Umar M. Ambulatory arthroscopic knee surgery: results of partial meniscectomy. J Pak Med Assoc. 1997;47(8):210–3.

Dandy DJ. Early results of closed partial meniscectomy. Br Med J. 1978;1(6120):1099–100.

Tapper EM, Hoover NW. Late results after meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51(3):517–26.

McGinity JB, Geuss LF, Marvin RA. Partial or total meniscectomy: a comparative analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59:763–6.

Gillquist J, Oretorp N. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. Technique and long-term results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;167:29–33.

Tregonning RJ. Closed partial meniscectomy: early results for simple tears with mechanical systems. J Bone Joint Surg Br.1983;65:378–82.

Whipple TL, Caspari RB, Meyers JF. Arthroscopic meniscectomy. An interim report at three to four years after operation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;183:105–14.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.